Five methods of Departmentalization Essay

Essay TopicWhat quintuplet methods have traditionally been implementd to departmentalize bestow and player? Give i payoff and one separate of for apiece one. Provide an simulation of functional departmentalization at your University and using the definitions in your textbook explain why it is suitable drill. (Chapter 9)In any size of the administration or complexity workplace, organisational anatomical structures are very classical factors that the businesses must have, so the employee will know their position, their responsibilities and tasks. To develop and improve organization performance, the organization burn down use various morphological can take on, however the organization need to find the best organisational structure that depends on many factors including the work, products or services, the size of the employee, geographic and target market (demographic customers base). The by-line section provides details of the five methods have traditionally been used to departmentalize employee and jobs, also advantage and disfavour each of the methods. Traditional organizational structures are connections among these positions are demonstrated in an organisational Chart which will show how wariness is organized vertical and horizontal configuration of departments, authority and job within a company (Williams & McWilliams 2010, p.175) each of department has a sharer, who runs day- to- day operations and ultimately report to the CEO, however this traditional model is reciprocal use in all church, government and military organization, be excite these organizations are stable, cannot respond to change and slow to act.For example every soldiers answer to his commanding officer, while the president is at the top of the chain as command-in-chief. Departmentalization is the plane section of work is the basic meaning of forms. The multidivisional form is defined as decentralized management structure organized into products divisions, each divisio n containing a unitary structure and a central office to make to strategic decisions. (P. James L. 1997) generally the basic decisions that managers have to make as they develop a traditional organizational structure are using the five traditional methods of functional, product, customer, geographic and matrix departmentalization. Which mean two or more people working together as a group to complete a item task, by divided the group to work in different departmentalization, to help achieve theorganization objectives and goals. moreover Determining the functions to be performed involves consideration of division of labour, (P. Montanna &B. Charnov, 1993, p. 1) and depending on the size of the grouping that managers supervise. The degree of decision-making authority is centralisation and usually were made by the top management of the highest vertically structures hierarchy. This section is additional detail and commentary of five methods has been used traditionally to departmentaliz ation. Functional departmentalization group of employee and job based on work performance, example finance and accounting, marketing and sale, human resource and administration and technical and operating. For another example of Functional departmentalization at Victoria University is Academic Support and Development because this department can students with University assessment tasks such as compose skills, reference skills, online language translator and providing expert support the student academic success and retention crossways the university.The advantage of functional departmentalization is efficiency of work and is to be done by specialist skills and high qualified. The single out is inflexibility of work because the stuff only is qualifies for one specialisation. Products departmentalization group of employee and work for producing major product or services area in the organization or company. Example David Jones, womens clothing, mens clothing, planetary house and foo d. The advantage of the product departmentalization is that increases accountability for product performance and allow manager and employee work in one area of expertise. The disadvantage is the challenge of coordinating across different product departments. Customer departmentalization group of employee and work into particular responsibility based on customers problem and need. Example government, education, health, wholesale or retail. The advantage is focused on customer need rather than on products or business function.The disadvantage customer departmentalization is the satisfaction or feedback from customer is challenging of coordinating across different customer departments. geographical Departmentalization groups of employee and work into separate units responsible for doing business in particular geographic area (Williams & McWilliams 2010, p.180). Example North, southward, West, East). The advantage of geographic departmentalization is face to face communication between the service provider and service receiver. Thedisadvantage is involve more human capital and the control cannot exercise legally. Matrix departmentalization a combined of one or two group form of departmentalization are used together based on particular project, more or less often are from product and functional departmentalization working together. The advantage of matrix departmentalization is allowing the organization to efficiently manage large, complex tasks and efficiency avoiding duplication.The disadvantage is requires a high level of management skill and can cause of conflict between bosses in departments. Through a different perspective on the issue can be seen by comparing between traditional model and modern model of the organizational structures, the traditional of organizational structures is illustrated as have feativeness and efficiency of products or services more than modern organizational structures. Because of emphasis on job specialization, highly performed on definite procedures and policy in the organization that effective work and worker, also the decentralization is the location of most authority at the upper levels of the organization. In a centralized organization, manager makes the most decision, even the relatively small one (Williams & McWilliams 2010, p.185) which help and improve the organization achieve their objectives and goals are better and quicker than apply on modern organizational structures. For the modern or twentieth century organizational structures is redesigning of making objective and goals setting attend to is through empower worker. gibe to(Williams & McWilliams 2010, p.185) Empower worker means permanently passing decision making authority and responsibility from managers to workers by giving them the information and resources they need to make and carry out good decisions. Which means all the process need to be share to every levels and decentralized authority is allowing a significant amount of worker wi thin the organization make the decision necessary to solve the problem. In conclusion the traditional organizational structures has five methods been used to departmentalizing work and workers such as the work Functional performs, the Product or dish offered, the target Customer or client, the Geographic region covered and the Matrix project that is combine or form two or more departmentalization to work together. These methods are used to in organization which effect work and worker with the best contribute to accomplishment organizations objectives and goals.Reference listBrews. P.J & Tucci. C. L, 2004, exploring the structural effect of internetworking, strategic management journal, vol. 25. No. 5, pp. 429-451 Woll .L.F.K & Moliance. M, 2013do organizational structure, work environment and gender consider? creatively and implementations of new ideas, international journal of gender and entrepreneurship, vol. 5. No.3. pp. 298-315 Dufty.N, 1996, a note on departmentalization in an nominate of technology, journal of education administration, vol. 4. No. 1, pp. 32-48 Williams. C & McWilliams. A, 2010, MGMT 1st Asian Pacific Edition, Cengage Learning Australia Pty, South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Price. L. J, 1997, handbook of organization measurement, international journal of Manpower, vol. 18 Iss 4/5/6 pp.305-558 P. Montanna & B. Charnov, 1993, chapter 11 organizational structures concepts and formats, management A streamlined course for students & business people. (Hauppauge, New York Barrons Business Reviewed Series), pp. 155-169